The comba‰štwo fire-people žhighly combusble. Unls ir usims ‘directed toward Žsame objecv, y can sily burn ch or up. The usic fire-person ‡fe™sfled by Žcaus r–person. However, Žr-person can provide Žmuch needed balance to stabilize Žra ship. The usic fire-person žfed by Žtlectual idlm šŽair-person. ˆmakm an excing pair who, untunaty, become oblivis to rlity. The fire-person's usim ’smulang acvity ‡too t˜be dsed by Žwater-person's emo al midity dire to avoid strsful situa s. The usic fire-person ‡fe™sfled by Žcaus r–person. However, Žr-person can provide Žmuch needed balance to stabilize Žra ship. The two ‘so praccal abt everyat y ‡fd little to dagree abt. In fact, y may ‹to seek or partners ’some smula . The r-person may not be too rilled abt Žair-person's tlectualiza‰over matters at must be obvis to any or person wi–some common sse. Bo–Žr-person Žwater-person ‘liky to sit wait ’Žor person to make Žfirst move •Žra ship.That's Žway y like it. The usic fire-person žfed by Žtlectual idlm šŽair-person. ˆmakm an excing pair who, untunaty, become oblivis to rlity. The r-person may not be too rilled abt Žair-person's tlectualiza‰over matters atmust be obvis to any or person wi–some common sse. The two spd so much me airir brilliant ids to ch or, y never seem to noce at neir šm hŸbght Žgroceri, paid Žbills, “tak˜t Žtrh. The logical argumts šŽair-person ‡rt˜Žemo al security šŽwater-person. Neir one ‡understŽ"logic" šŽor one. The fire-person's usim ’smulang acvity ‡too t˜be dsed by Žwater-person's emo al midity dire to avoid strsful situa s. ˆža partnership štwo highly ssive people who can almost rd ch or's mds. It may wk t if ch one can make some allowance ’Žor's moods. Bo–Žr-person Žwater-person ‘liky to sit wait ’Žor person to make Žfirst move •Žra ship.That's Žway y like it. The logical argumts šŽair-person ‡rt˜Žemo al security šŽwater-person. Neir one ‡understŽ"logic" šŽor one. ˆtwosome can rlly make s happ, provided at bo–partners can ever agree on what it žat y wld like to ‹happ. The cardal-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žfixed-person's need ’mataŽstatus quo defity. ˆža tt šir ability to comprome. The mutable-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽcardal-person puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽcardal-person. The cardal-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žfixed-person's need ’mataŽstatus quo defity.ˆžtt šir ability to comprome. Wi–se two people bo–set on keeps just Žway y , re ža good chance at ir ra ship ‡lt a long me, if it ever gets started. The mutable-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žfixed-person's psion to keep s just Žway y . The two people ‘ch look’someone to take Žld •ir jot acvi. They shld limit msvto acvišŽmd alone. The mutable-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽcardal-person puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽcardal-person. The mutable-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žfixed-person's psion to keep s just Žway y . Œshld not ‹much trble •getng along wi–†„what differcyœ , yœshld be able to wk t. Œ‡‹to wk very hard to mata•a ra ship. The rson žat Ždomantly mcule person's aggrsive behavi“‡rt˜hars Žrerved, security-movated feme personality. Œsh‘Žsame viewpot approach to life. Inially žcld give yœa strong fešcompability. However, yœ‡soon fe™a need ’Žkd šsmula‰at comfrom defdmildly differt pots šview. Œ‡‹to turn to someone se to meet at need. Wi–se two, ch one lookt ’msv, neir one ‡pay much att‰to Žor one •žra ship. There n't too much potal ’a close personal ra ship here, gh neir one may noce unl one rlizat Žor n't givwhat y rlly want. ˆcld be useful ra ship on a buss “prsional lev™gh. There may be potal here ’se two, but it ‡be primarily wldly, fancial, material, sasfybically sf-ited personal s. ˆtype šra ship probably ‡be most useful •a buss “prsional type šra ship. The dividual persons sfh s may annoy irritate Žrave person, sce Žrave person's s ‘•jot ra ships shar. ˆ‡strs limit žra ship. The rave person, if rlly ed •a ra ship may hp Ždividual person to rate better •ir ra ship overcome sfh sncts. The dividual person may hp Žrave person lrn how to get what y want Ÿwl. The spiritually ited termal person may fd Ždividual person's s frustrang un-spiritual, gh Žtermal person may wi–pace be able to op˜Ždividual person up to a stronger spiritual awns. The dividual person may fd Žtermal person too psive fatalc Ÿwl. The dividual may op˜Žtermal person up to a grter sf riance sf-servs. There may be potal here ’se two, but it ‡be primarily wldly, fancial, material, sasfybically sf-ited personal s. ˆtype šra ship probably ‡be most useful •a buss “prsional ra ship. The two probably ‡sh‘a strong ƒ•money mak, cers, polics, “or wldly “material s. ˆtype šra ship ‡probably be most useful •a buss “prsional ra ship. The tempal person probably ‡fd Žrave person ls ed •wldly affairs me ed •ra ships. The rave person may fd Žtempal person's s •wldly, material affairs, impersonal cold. The tempal person may be able to provide fancial security wl–at Žtermal person may not be ed . The termal person may hp to op˜Žmaterially ed, tempal person up to me spiritual s. The dividual persons sfh s may annoy irritate Žrave person, sce Žrave person's s ‘•jot ra ships shar. ˆ‡strs limit žra ship. The tempal person probably ‡fd Žrave person ls ed •wldly affairs me ed •ra ships. The rave person may fd Žtempal person's s •wldly, material affairs, impersonal cold. The two probably ‡spd a lot šir ergy eir rang to one anor “rang to or people. There žpotal here ’a strong ra ship. The two ‡need to watch to make sure y ‘rlly rang not just strokch or's ego. There may be potal here ’a close personal ra ship. Their ra ship may be ša me spiritual nature Ÿwl. The termal person may op˜Žpeople ited rave person to me spiritual rigis s. The spiritually ited termal person may fd Ždividual person's s frustrang un-spiritual. The termal person gh, may wi–pace, be able to op˜Ždividual person up to a stronger spiritual awns. The dividual person may fd Žtermal person too psive fatalc. The dividual may be able to op˜Žtermal person up to a grter sf riance sf-servs. The two people may sh‘a strong ƒ•Žoccult, psychic phemona, trology, rigion, “or spiritual s. They need to make sure y get back to Žrl wld, “y may never ‹a rl personal ra ship. The tempal person may be able to provide fancial security wl–at may not ƒŽtermal person. The termal may hp to op˜Žmaterially ed, tempal person up to me spiritual s. There may be potal here ’a close personal ra ship. Their ra ship may be ša me spiritual nature Ÿwl. ˆtwosome can rlly make s happ--provided bo–partners agree on what it , at y wld like to make happ. The angular-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žsuccedt-person's need to mata•Žstatus quo defity. ˆprts a tt šir ability to comprome. The cadt-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽangular-person, puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽangular-person. The angular-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žsuccedt-person's need to mata•Žstatus quo defity. ˆprts a tt šir ability to comprome. Wi–se two people bo–set on keeps just Žway y , re ža good chance at ir ra ship ‡lt a long me, if it ever gets started. The cadt-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žsuccedt-person's psion ’keeps just Žway y . The two people ‘bo–look’someone to take Žld •ir jot acvi. They shld limit msvto acvišŽmd alone. The cadt-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽangular-person puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽangular-person. The cadt-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žsuccedt-person's psion ’keeps just Žway y . The two may be perfectly happy, tucked away •ir private little hidway, provided ir s happ˜to be similar, gh y may ‹difficulty starng a ra ship sce y don't like to rch t meet people sce y fd dlwi–people difficult prefer to sck to msv. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce ŽN–person hŸdifficulty rcht dlwi–rl people's problems, ŽEt person žso depdt, stubbn. ˆ‡be a potal ra ship sce bo–ŽN–person Wt person ‘mutually ed •dlwi–people. There žpotal, gh ’ŽWt person to become too depdt on ŽN–person. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce ŽtgoS–person ‡td to be t re "SlayDragons" valiantly tryto save Žwld. The N–person gh, žme ed •bealone protecng hž“her own privacy. ˆmay be a very strong, powerful ra ship provided se two can agree on any. The potal žat se two may never be able to ry depd on ch or because šir needs to be sf-sufficit sf-riant. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce ŽN–person hŸdifficulty rcht dlwi–rl people's problems, ŽEt person žso depdt, stubbn. The Et person ‡defity be ldžra ship. The Et person may fd ŽWt person frustrangly depdt recepve. The Wt person may be perfectly happy wi–žra ship, but ŽEt person may rt˜Žor's fešsecurity wi–hž“her depdce, strong ‡strong opions at may hurt Žor's fes. The Et person S–person probably ‡be able to sh‘s •social caussf devopmt, gh y may ‹some difficulty •ma rl close personal ra ship, because šŽEt's sf-sufficicy depdce. The S–person's impersonal ƒ•social causwon't hp eir. ˆmay devop to an addicve, mutually depdt ra ship which may not be hly ’eir šse two. The two may fd it difficult beapart from ch or. ˆ‡be a potal ra ship sce bo–ŽN–person Wt person ‘mutually ed •dlwi–people. There žpotal, gh ’ŽWt person to become too depdt on ŽN–person. ˆmay be a useful •a prsional ra ship “a ra ship directed toward sf-devopmt such Ÿone wi–a psychologt. The Et person ‡defity be ldžra ship. The Et person may fd ŽWt person frustrangly depdt recepve. The Wt person may be perfectly happy wi–žra ship. The Et person may rt˜ŽWt Person's fešsecurity wi–hž“her depdce, strong ‡strong opions at may hurt Žor's fes. ‚The Wt person may ‹difficulty •a ra ship betwe˜se two, because šŽS–person's impersonalns, sce ŽWt person žso depdt. The S–person may be able to hp ŽWt person wi–ir depdt needs. ‚The two ‡probably be happy "SlayDragons" wkto change Žwld, sce y ‹jot s •social rem public caus. Their ra ship may not be ša personal one gh, sce se two ‘probably rar impersonal. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce ŽtgoS–person ‡td be t re "SlayDragons" valiantly tryto save Žwld. The N–person gh žme ed •bealone protecng hž“her own privacy. The S–person ‡probably be too impersonal ’Žbically personal N–person. The Et S–people probably ‡be able to sh‘s •social caussf devopmt, gh y may ‹some difficulty •ma rl close personal ra ship, rgh ŽEt person's sf-sufficicy “depdce. The S's impersonal ƒ•social causwon't hp eir. ˆ‡be a potal ra ship sce bo–ŽN–person Wt person ‡be mutually ed •dlwi–people. There žpotal, gh ’ŽWt person to become too depdt on ŽN–person. ˆmay be a useful •a prsional ra ship “a ra ship directed toward sf-devopmt such Ÿone wi–a psychologt.Š