Click here for My Deja News. |
Article 23 of exactly 31 |
<< Previous Article |
>> Next Article |
/\ Current Results |
|
|
|
Subject: Re: A New CSA 'Victory" From: Conrad Hodson <conradh@efn.org> Date: 1997/12/05 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.95.971205053446.26371E-100000@garcia.efn.org> Newsgroups: soc.history.what-if [Subscribe to soc.history.what-if] [More Headers] On 4 Dec 1997, Jim Rittenhouse wrote: > > > >I picture this much like the migration of slaves into texas from the 1850s on. > >Remember that the frontier held a strong attraction. I would admit that little > >agricultural land remained to be settled in the South East, but Mississippi, > >Arkansas and Texas still had land available. > > Well, there's land and land - and suitable land - and who's paying for all > this land? > A lot of it was never paid for at all. The early settlers in an area often filtered quietly in to land the local Indians weren't using; but whether the natives resisted early or late in the settlement process the results were almost total defeat and displacement by whites, or whites plus black slaves on the Southern parts of the frontier. While each side in the slavery/abolition debates tried to out-grow its opponent in the struggle for control of new territories, it was widely recognized at the time that the familiar crops of north and south grew in different sorts of climate. So Yankee imperialists grabbed the Oregon country, and kept eyeing Canada, and Seward even bought Alaska on OTL. Southern imperialists settled and aided Texas, first supporting its independence and later its annexation to the prewar US. They also openly advocated further conquests in the Caribbean, Central America and the remainder of Mexico; William Walker's conquest of Nicaragua had mostly Southern personnel and support. No state north of the Isthmus was really fit to fend off Confederate aggression; barring some kind of "Monroe Doctrine" by European powers the Confederacy might well have expanded there when it ran out of good land in Texas. > > This is a big leap. Most big plantations were way away from cities. Slave > labor at industrial work is not particularly useful, IMHO, except in the > coal-scuttle department. Not motivated or trained, can't read instructions, > etc. > Actually, in the mid-19th Century, a lot of industry was not particularly urban. A newly independent Confederacy would have had two obvious industries to expand: iron and textiles. Both had been developed before the war, and neither one was noted (in the South, at least) for seeking urban locations. Ironmaking in particular sprang up in rural areas, largely employing farmers in their off-season. (See _Foxfire 5_ for some fascinating looks at rural Southern ironmaking) Cotton and hemp milling, like ironmaking, involved bulky products; there were logistical as well as value-added arguments for spinning and weaving close to the areas where the staple was grown. At the time of the Civil War, the vast majority of textile mills, north or south, were water-powered; steam did not take over until quite late in the century. Water power sites were also quite dispersed and often rural. Given these, and also the fact that Southern enterprises often demanded the importation of the most skilled workers anyway, cities were not really prerequisites for industrial growth. On OTL, in fact, local histories are full of mills built in the woods, with towns then springing up around them. The CSA's third obvious industrial growth area, petroleum, is also based on a dispersed resource; by the late 1850's enough wealth was flowing from wells in Pennsylvania, Rumania and Poland that the South could get the idea. Most southern slaves were not technicians, of course, but neither were the European peasant immigrants who ran the northern factories of the era, or the Chinese peasant immigrants who built the California railroads. Nonetheless, the industries and the railroads _were_ built. Much of such building was done with pick and shovel and axe and sledge, while most factory jobs were deliberately simplified to exploit the immigrants who couldn't speak English, let alone read and write it. The difference between a black plow jockey from Alabama and a white plow jockey from Ireland were not that great; particularly since the factory or mine was an alien environment for either of them. Conrad Hodson
Click here for My Deja News. |
<< Previous Article |
>> Next Article |
/\ Current Results |
|
|
|
IBM Netfinity |
Directories |
Classifieds |
Yellow Pages
About Deja News ·
New Users ·
Advertising Info ·
How are we doing?
Copyright © 1995-98 Deja News, Inc. All rights reserved. Conditions of use. |